We reaffirm our love for the Land of Israel, our solidarity with our brothers and
sisters who dwell within its borders, and our commitment to the State of Israel.
We rejoice in its existence, delight in its achievements, care about its security,
seek its welfare, believe in its future, and hope for the ever fuller realisation
of the ideals set forth in its Proclamation of Independence, so that it may become
more and more a force for good in the life of the Jewish people, of the Middle East
region and of humanity.
We also reaffirm our faith in the Diaspora. In spite of the sufferings our people have
experienced in dispersion, there have been nations which have welcomed Jews as citizens,
and periods of Jewish religious and cultural creativity stimulated by close contact with
other religions and cultures. Moreover, as a universal religion, Judaism is in principle
at home anywhere on God's earth, and since it has a redemptive contribution to make to the
life of humanity (to be 'a light to the nations'), it is positively desirable that there
should be a Jewish presence in many lands. We therefore urge the importance of maintaining
strong, confident and self- respecting Jewish communities in the Diaspora.
We endorse Rabbi Leo Baeck's perception of the Jewish people as an ellipse having
two foci. Israel and the Diaspora have somewhat different roles to play, but
they both exist for the same ultimate purpose, defined by Judaism, and should
therefore be seen as equal partners in a common task.
We desire to see a constructive relationship, of mutual respect, support and enrichment
between Israel and the Diaspora. We believe that the Diaspora has the responsibility of
sharing in the upbuilding of the State of lsrael as a haven of refuge and a society where
Jews can live in dignity and set an example to mankind. We therefore urge our communities
to continue and intensify all appropriate endeavours, including cultural activities,
financial support for humanitarian purposes in Israel, and the encouragement of individual
and group visits to Israel, towards that end.
We believe that these endeavours should include the presentation of Aliyah as a noble
option available to Diaspora Jews, and the encouragement of those who choose to seek their
self-fulfilment, and to make their contribution to Jewish life, in that way. However, we
reaffirm our belief that full participation in Jewish life in the Diaspora, to ensure its
continuation, is equally honourable.
We demand full acceptance of the principle of religious pluralism, with all its
implications, both in Israeli law and in the Zionist and communal organisations of
the Diaspora. This requires that Progressive Judaism, as well as Conservative Judaism,
be accorded recognition and respect, rights and opportunities, on terms of absolute
equality with Orthodox Judaism. We regard this as a matter of justice, which is
therefore independent of numerical considerations, and unnegotiable.
We believe that the Israel-Diaspora partnership requires mutual respect as well as open,
candid and vigorous discussion of common concerns between the partners and within each.
Such discussion should not exclude responsible criticism of particular governmental
policies or other aspects of Israeli society, expressed with loving concern and due
deliberation.
For every possible reason, including its own long-term survival, Israel's greatest need
is to 'seek peace and pursue it' (Psalm 34:15). We recognise that there is room for a
variety of views as to the best way of attaining that objective, but it seems to us
self-evident that the whole ethos of Judaism in general, and of Liberal Judaism in
particular, should incline us towards the view of those who would cede territory for
lasting peace. Reconciliation between Jews and Arabs is a goal towards which we strive.
Concern for secure borders and political and military stability needs to be seen as
compatible with justice for all. The legitimate security demands of Israel can - and
must - be reconciled with the human and political rights of Palestinian Arabs. It is
for all these reasons that we support the concept of territorial compromise. Our
endorsement of these principles is in basic accord with a resolution adopted in
1984 by the Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), the world's largest
rabbinic assembly, with over 1200 members.
We believe that we have a Jewish religious duty to foster, especially within Anglo-Jewry,
a climate of opinion supportive of the quest for peace. This requires us to keep ourselves
well informed, to seek an objective understanding of the issues, and to exemplify and
encourage the forces of moderation and reconciliation rather than those of strident
partisanship.
We applaud all sincere peace initiatives, and believe that such plans should always be
sympathetically considered for their possible merits rather than rejected out of hand
for their perceived inadequacies. Likewise we welcome all contacts and conversations
between the protagonists of the conflict in the Middle East and their respective
supporters in Britain which may help to lessen tension, dispel ignorance, overcome
mistrust, and build bridges of understanding.
We call upon all States which have not already done so to recognise the State of Israel
and establish normal relations with it. We ask all religious communities to try to
understand the importance of the State of Israel for the Jewish people. We pledge
ourselves to work together with all nations and religions for the achievement of
peace in the Middle East, and for the cessation of war, terrorism and all forms of
violence, the relief of suffering, and the establishment of justice, in all societies
everywhere.